Sunday, December 17, 2006

Circumcision

Recently Playboy has had a lot of articles in the Advisor and Dear Playboy about male circumcision. This seems to be a debated topic for a lot of people, personally I am on the side of not having it done. I wasn't cut as a child, and there is really no reason to have it done.

Lots of people will talk about that one person who had an infection or complication later in life, but that is usually 1 out of Millions.

Its dirty, it holds disease. Also a myth, there is nothing more hygenic about being circumcised then not being.

Women will be not approve of it. WTF? Really I have never had a woman complain about the fact that I wasn't circumcised. If anything they were curious and intrigued.

To follow the arguement of bad things can happen later, think about this.
When you are born you don't have your appendix or tonsils removed even though they may cause problems later in life. If your appendix bursts you could die. Nobody ever died from a penial infection.

Leave the foreskin alone, there is no need for it to be done.

White Knight,

1 comment:

PinkMonkey said...

Though I do agree with your arguement, when baby Layne is born in May, he will be circumcised. I can honestly say that I have no true opinion -- having found no great issue for or against -- but in this case, I defer to the opinion of the dad.

It is how the man was raised -- with or without -- that skews the opinion. As a woman, I only can see the difference without ever knowing the true feeling.

Smiles,
Monkey